In a dramatic twist, New York Judge Juan Merchan has delayed sentencing for President-elect Donald Trump, raising serious questions about the future of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s controversial case. Could this misbegotten prosecution finally collapse under its own weight? Critics say it’s long overdue.

The Case That Never Should Have Been Filed

Bragg’s case against Trump has been called everything from “incoherent” to “a shameless political stunt.” The DA’s strategy? Resurrect long-expired business record misdemeanors and magically transform them into election felonies—despite lacking jurisdiction over federal campaign laws.

Even worse, the transactions in question occurred months after the 2016 election, and the payments involved don’t even qualify as campaign contributions under the law.

“A competent judge would have tossed this case in the trash the moment it was filed,” legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said. “Instead, Judge Merchan went all-in, turning what should have been a dismissal into a political circus.”

A Judge Under Fire

Merchan’s actions have sparked outrage and accusations of bias. From refusing to recuse himself over his own campaign donations and familial ties, to silencing Trump with an unconstitutional gag order, Merchan’s rulings have left legal experts scratching their heads.

“This wasn’t a fair trial—it was a farce,” Jarrett argued. “Merchan consistently violated Trump’s right to due process, transforming the courtroom into a venue for anti-Trump sentiment.”

The judge even allowed convicted perjurer Michael Cohen to spin fantastical tales on the stand while blocking critical expert testimony that could have dismantled the prosecution’s flimsy case.

The Supreme Court Looms

Trump’s defense is now banking on a July 1 Supreme Court decision that grants presidents broad immunity from prosecution for official acts. The ruling has left Bragg and Merchan scrambling, as much of their case hinges on Trump’s actions while in office.

“This conviction alone has a very high probability of being overturned,” Jarrett stated. “Bragg and Merchan know it—but will they admit defeat?”

A Political Backlash

The trial hasn’t just floundered in the courtroom—it’s failed at the ballot box. Americans saw through what many believe was a weaponized legal strategy aimed at derailing Trump’s political career. Instead, Trump emerged victorious in the 2024 election, leaving Bragg and Merchan with egg on their faces.

“Their vindictive lawfare strategy backfired spectacularly,” Jarrett said. “Americans weren’t fooled.”

What Happens Next?

With sentencing now postponed and Trump set to begin his second term in January, both the DA and judge have an opportunity to quietly end this case before higher courts expose its flaws. But will they take the off-ramp?

“If the past is any indication, don’t hold your breath,” Jarrett warned.

The Bigger Picture

This trial has become a flashpoint for debates over judicial ethics, prosecutorial overreach, and the weaponization of the legal system. For Trump supporters, it’s proof that their candidate is a fighter. For critics, it’s a cautionary tale of what happens when politics infects the courtroom.

What’s Your Take?

Did Bragg and Merchan’s case against Trump go too far? Share your thoughts in the comments and don’t forget to like and share this article to keep the conversation going!