More
    HomeUS NewsHow officials explained bizarre penalty that negated Patriots interception

    How officials explained bizarre penalty that negated Patriots interception

    Published on

    GLENDALE, Ariz. — The Patriots not only played poorly in Sunday’s 30-17 loss to the Cardinals, they also couldn’t catch any breaks.

    Late in the third quarter and trailing 16-3, Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray lofted an interception to cornerback Jonathan Jones. The play was negated, however, because Patriots outside linebacker Anfernee Jennings was flagged for a roughing the passer penalty for hitting Murray after he got rid of the ball.

    Here’s a transcript of a pool report with ESPN’s Mike Reiss and referee Ron Tolbert after the game:

    Question: What did you see on the field that led to the flag for roughing the passer (third quarter, 3rd-and-6, Arizona 8)?

    Torbert: “The flag came from the umpire’s position. The umpire saw a hit to the quarterback’s helmet just after he had thrown the ball.”

    Question: How does the quarterback scrambling as a runner as he approaches the line of scrimmage before throwing the ball affect the protection provided to the quarterback under the roughing the passer rule?

    Torbert: “This does not impact the protection that he gets from forcible hits to the helmet. Although he is scrambling and working the pocket, he still gets the same protection from forcible hits to the helmet that he would if he were standing in the pocket.”

    Question: If in a situation like that, a quarterback maybe lowers his head after throwing the ball before contact was made by the defense, how would that affect the protection to quarterbacks under the roughing the passer rule?

    Torbert: ”By rule, that action does not impact the protection that he gets from forcible hits to the helmet. We would have to see that action if it happens. That in itself does not change the protection that he gets from forcible hits to the helmet. “

    Question: For a defensive player who would ask what he would have to do to not be penalized in that situation, is the answer as simple as there cannot be forcible contact to the helmet?

    Torbert: “In that particular situation, given that’s what we called, that would be the answer. That is the reason that the flag was thrown, because of the forcible contact to the quarterback’s head and neck area.”



    Source link

    Latest articles

    Patriots could use more players with Antonio Gibson’s mindset

    FOXBORO — If the Patriots had 53 players like Antonio Gibson on their roster,...

    MacKenzie Scott reveals another $2B in donations in 2024

    By THALIA BEATY, Associated PressNEW YORK (AP) — Billionaire author and philanthropist MacKenzie Scott...

    MrBeast’s show includes criticized $4.2M giveaway

    By JAMES POLLARD, Associated PressNEW YORK (AP) — MrBeast’s ambitious reality show, which the...

    Millions of people may get expanded Social Security benefits

    By BILL BARROW, Associated PressATLANTA (AP) — Nearly 3 million people could receive a...

    More like this

    Patriots could use more players with Antonio Gibson’s mindset

    FOXBORO — If the Patriots had 53 players like Antonio Gibson on their roster,...

    MacKenzie Scott reveals another $2B in donations in 2024

    By THALIA BEATY, Associated PressNEW YORK (AP) — Billionaire author and philanthropist MacKenzie Scott...

    MrBeast’s show includes criticized $4.2M giveaway

    By JAMES POLLARD, Associated PressNEW YORK (AP) — MrBeast’s ambitious reality show, which the...